Effect of Artificial Intelligence on Real Estate and Housing Markets in Africa:Affordability Crisis, Valuation Bias, and Urban Housing Policy Solutions
Keywords:
artificial intelligence, real estate Africa, housing affordability, algorithmic valuation bias, rent pricing AI, mortgage exclusion, informal settlements, right to housing, PropTech, urban policy AfricaAbstract
This study examines the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on real estate and housing markets in Africa, focusing on the affordability crisis driven by AI algorithmic rent pricing, mortgage exclusion systems, and valuation bias in AI property assessments. These issues perpetuate racial and socioeconomic housing inequality. The study uses a mixed-methods approach, including documentary analysis, comparative housing policy mapping, and secondary data from UN-Habitat, the World Bank, African Development Bank, and national housing authorities in Nigeria, Kenya, South Africa, Ghana, and Egypt. Grounded in Socio-Spatial Stratification Theory and the Right to the City Framework, the study identifies six disruption areas: AI property valuations replicating racial disparities, algorithmic rent-setting enabling above-market increases, predictive eviction systems generating preemptive evictions based on risk profiles, smart city tools displacing informal settlements, AI mortgage scoring excluding urban workers, and AI platform monopolies excluding unplatformed properties. Findings show that AI is exacerbating housing unaffordability, deepening discrimination, and widening the divide between formal and informal markets, with no AI-specific housing justice framework. The study introduces the African AI housing affordability and inclusion gap, contrasting AI systems that optimize asset value with housing justice principles of affordability, accessibility, and non-discrimination. It proposes a seven-pillar housing policy framework, including algorithmic bias audits, anti-collusion rent pricing standards, eviction prohibitions, informal settlement inclusion rights, alternative data mortgage standards, PropTech regulation, and a continental AI housing governance architecture under the African Union and UN-Habitat. These findings offer actionable recommendations for policymakers.
Downloads
References
REFERENCES
[1] United Nations Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. (1991). General Comment No. 4: The Right to Adequate Housing (Art. 11(1) of the Covenant). UN Doc. E/1992/23. Geneva: CESCR. https://www.refworld.org/docid/47a7079a1.html
[2] United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. (2022). World Population Prospects 2022: Summary of Results. UN DESA/POP/2022/TR/NO. 3. New York: United Nations. https://population.un.org/wpp/
[3] Schneider, V. (2020). Locked out by big data: how big data algorithms and machine learning may undermine housing justice. Columbia Human Rights Law Review, 52(1), pp.251–305. https://hrlr.law.columbia.edu/hrlr/locked-out-by-big-data-how-big-data-algorithms-and-machine-learning-may-undermine-housing-justice/
[4] UN-Habitat. (2022). World Cities Report 2022: Envisaging the Future of Cities. Nairobi: United Nations Human Settlements Programme. https://unhabitat.org/wcr/
[5] Centre for Affordable Housing Finance in Africa. (2023). Housing Finance in Africa Yearbook 2023. 14th edn. Johannesburg: CAHF. https://housingfinanceafrica.org/resources/yearbook/
[6] Federal Ministry of Housing and Urban Development, Nigeria. (2023). National Housing Policy Review. Abuja: FMHUD.
[7] State Department for Housing and Urban Development, Kenya. (2023). Kenya Affordable Housing Programme: Progress Report. Nairobi: Ministry of Lands, Public Works, Housing and Urban Development.
[8] Department of Human Settlements, Republic of South Africa. (2023). Annual Report 2022/2023. Pretoria: DHS. https://www.dhs.gov.za/
[9] Ministry of Works and Housing, Ghana. (2023). Ghana Housing Profile. Accra: MWH.
[10] Ministry of Housing, Utilities and Urban Communities, Arab Republic of Egypt. (2023). Annual Report 2022/2023. Cairo: MHUUC.
[11] U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2025). Property Technology for Homebuying: Products Present Benefits and Risks Amid Evolving Federal Oversight. GAO-26-107185. Washington DC: GAO. https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-26-107185
[12] Odendaal, N. (2022). Splintering by proxy: a reflection on the spatial impacts and distributed agency of platform urbanism. Journal of Urban Technology, 29(1), pp.21–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2021.2007204
[13] Harvey, D. (1973). Social Justice and the City. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
[14] Soja, E.W. (1989). Postmodern Geographies: The Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory. London: Verso.
[15] Pieterse, E. (2008). City Futures: Confronting the Crisis of Urban Development. London: Zed Books.
[16] Watson, V. (2014). African urban fantasies: dreams or nightmares? Environment and Urbanization, 26(1), pp.215–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247813513705
[17] Lefebvre, H. (1968). Le Droit à la ville. Paris: Anthropos. (English translation: Lefebvre, H. (1996). Writings on Cities, trans. E. Kofman and E. Lebas. Oxford: Blackwell.)
[18] Purcell, M. (2002). Excavating Lefebvre: the right to the city and its urban politics of the inhabitant. GeoJournal, 58(2–3), pp.99–108. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:GEJO.0000010829.62237.8f
[19] Miraftab, F. (2009). Insurgent planning: situating radical planning in the Global South. Planning Theory, 8(1), pp.32–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095208099297
[20] Creswell, J.W. and Creswell, J.D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 5th edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
[21] World Bank. (2022). The Global Findex Database 2021: Financial Inclusion, Digital Payments, and Resilience in the Age of COVID-19. Washington DC: World Bank Group. https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/globalfindex
[22] Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. London: SAGE Publications.
[23] Calder-Wang, S. and Kim, G.H. (2024). Algorithmic pricing in multifamily rentals: efficiency gains or price coordination? Working Paper, The Wharton School. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4403058
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 IIAR Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Emerging Technologies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
